<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free batch geocoding application</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lsnc.net/equity/2008/05/05/free-batch-geocoding-application/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lsnc.net/equity/2008/05/05/free-batch-geocoding-application/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:49:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwgold</title>
		<link>http://www.lsnc.net/equity/2008/05/05/free-batch-geocoding-application/comment-page-1/#comment-21455</link>
		<dc:creator>dwgold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 07:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lsnc.net/equity/2008/05/05/free-batch-geocoding-application/#comment-21455</guid>
		<description>USC has developed a new site for geocoding address data which is free, secure, accurate, and located at https://webgis.usc.edu - The site can process databases of addresses or single ones and can do deterministic address parsing and normalization too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USC has developed a new site for geocoding address data which is free, secure, accurate, and located at <a href="https://webgis.usc.edu" rel="nofollow">https://webgis.usc.edu</a> &#8211; The site can process databases of addresses or single ones and can do deterministic address parsing and normalization too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baudmap</title>
		<link>http://www.lsnc.net/equity/2008/05/05/free-batch-geocoding-application/comment-page-1/#comment-14781</link>
		<dc:creator>baudmap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lsnc.net/equity/2008/05/05/free-batch-geocoding-application/#comment-14781</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;d like to try a desktop geocoder, &lt;a href=&quot;aliwal.googlecode.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Aliwal Geocode&lt;/a&gt; might be useful. It&#039;s open source and uses Yahoo maps &amp; geocoding API too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;d like to try a desktop geocoder, <a href="aliwal.googlecode.com" rel="nofollow">Aliwal Geocode</a> might be useful. It&#8217;s open source and uses Yahoo maps &amp; geocoding API too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElektroMoose</title>
		<link>http://www.lsnc.net/equity/2008/05/05/free-batch-geocoding-application/comment-page-1/#comment-13574</link>
		<dc:creator>ElektroMoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 16:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lsnc.net/equity/2008/05/05/free-batch-geocoding-application/#comment-13574</guid>
		<description>I also had problems with KLM2SHP and was unable to successfully create shp files from Google Earth/Map KML files. Try KLMer (http://xbbster.googlepages.com/kmler). I single license costs about $20 and I had no problem importing KLM map objects to shp files using KMLer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also had problems with KLM2SHP and was unable to successfully create shp files from Google Earth/Map KML files. Try KLMer (<a href="http://xbbster.googlepages.com/kmler" rel="nofollow">http://xbbster.googlepages.com/kmler</a>). I single license costs about $20 and I had no problem importing KLM map objects to shp files using KMLer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lsnc.net/equity/2008/05/05/free-batch-geocoding-application/comment-page-1/#comment-13419</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lsnc.net/equity/2008/05/05/free-batch-geocoding-application/#comment-13419</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t get kml2shp to work. I have tried saving numerous point features as KML but none of the KML files can be opened by kml2shp. thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t get kml2shp to work. I have tried saving numerous point features as KML but none of the KML files can be opened by kml2shp. thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElektroMoose</title>
		<link>http://www.lsnc.net/equity/2008/05/05/free-batch-geocoding-application/comment-page-1/#comment-13093</link>
		<dc:creator>ElektroMoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 22:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lsnc.net/equity/2008/05/05/free-batch-geocoding-application/#comment-13093</guid>
		<description>Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.lsnc.net/equity/2008/05/05/free-batch-geocoding-application/comment-page-1/#comment-13090</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lsnc.net/equity/2008/05/05/free-batch-geocoding-application/#comment-13090</guid>
		<description>If you need to convert KML placemarks to shapefiles, you might try kml2shp -- freeware described here:

http://freegeographytools.com/2007/the-last-word-for-now-on-converting-google-earth-kml-files-to-shapefiles

I&#039;ve used it, but only for a few dozen points, so don&#039;t know how well it handles thousands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you need to convert KML placemarks to shapefiles, you might try kml2shp &#8212; freeware described here:</p>
<p><a href="http://freegeographytools.com/2007/the-last-word-for-now-on-converting-google-earth-kml-files-to-shapefiles" rel="nofollow">http://freegeographytools.com/2007/the-last-word-for-now-on-converting-google-earth-kml-files-to-shapefiles</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used it, but only for a few dozen points, so don&#8217;t know how well it handles thousands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElektroMoose</title>
		<link>http://www.lsnc.net/equity/2008/05/05/free-batch-geocoding-application/comment-page-1/#comment-13074</link>
		<dc:creator>ElektroMoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lsnc.net/equity/2008/05/05/free-batch-geocoding-application/#comment-13074</guid>
		<description>Thank you for pointing out that addresses that are not matched are assigned lat/long of 0. Although BatchGeocode states that users shouldn&#039;t geocode more than 500 addresses at a time I had no problem doing 4,500 at a time. 

I don&#039;t have any experience with Maptitude but I imagine that the 2006 Tiger street file is a big step-up from the 2000 Tiger street file included with ArcView. 

I wish there was a way to take advantage of Google&#039;s super-current street information. I also wouldn&#039;t mind having the ability to convert locations of certain businesses into point shape files for use in ArcView. Any developers out their want to do a little programming for the REP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for pointing out that addresses that are not matched are assigned lat/long of 0. Although BatchGeocode states that users shouldn&#8217;t geocode more than 500 addresses at a time I had no problem doing 4,500 at a time. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have any experience with Maptitude but I imagine that the 2006 Tiger street file is a big step-up from the 2000 Tiger street file included with ArcView. </p>
<p>I wish there was a way to take advantage of Google&#8217;s super-current street information. I also wouldn&#8217;t mind having the ability to convert locations of certain businesses into point shape files for use in ArcView. Any developers out their want to do a little programming for the REP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.lsnc.net/equity/2008/05/05/free-batch-geocoding-application/comment-page-1/#comment-12774</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lsnc.net/equity/2008/05/05/free-batch-geocoding-application/#comment-12774</guid>
		<description>BatchGeocode is great, but there is one drawback -- in some instances, an address match cannot be found and the site is automatically assigned to the center point of the zipcode or city. These imprecise geocodes can be identified by geocoding your list a second time based on city and zip only. Coordinates in the initial set of geocodes by address are not precisely geocoded by address if they match coordinates returned for the city/zip geocodes (generated at step 6 on the Batch Geocoder form) A quick way to spot the imprecise addresses is to copy this second list of coordinates into a spreadsheet and subtract them from the first set. City-only or zipcode-only matches will equal 0.00000000..... 

For massive jobs, I use Maptitude. It is a full-fledged GIS and costs $500. You get an enhanced 2006 TIGER nationwide street file with the software at no extra cost. Geocoding is extremely fast and seems to have no limits. In 2004, I geocoded the entire Michigan registered voter file n a single batch using Maptitude i. (6.8 million names -- 98% match rate.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BatchGeocode is great, but there is one drawback &#8212; in some instances, an address match cannot be found and the site is automatically assigned to the center point of the zipcode or city. These imprecise geocodes can be identified by geocoding your list a second time based on city and zip only. Coordinates in the initial set of geocodes by address are not precisely geocoded by address if they match coordinates returned for the city/zip geocodes (generated at step 6 on the Batch Geocoder form) A quick way to spot the imprecise addresses is to copy this second list of coordinates into a spreadsheet and subtract them from the first set. City-only or zipcode-only matches will equal 0.00000000&#8230;.. </p>
<p>For massive jobs, I use Maptitude. It is a full-fledged GIS and costs $500. You get an enhanced 2006 TIGER nationwide street file with the software at no extra cost. Geocoding is extremely fast and seems to have no limits. In 2004, I geocoded the entire Michigan registered voter file n a single batch using Maptitude i. (6.8 million names &#8212; 98% match rate.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
